Design Analysis of a Portable Concrete Mixer

Ovundah King Wofuru-Nyenke 1
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

International Journal of Applied Sciences and Advanced Technology (IJASAT)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 1 - 6
Published: 2 June 2025

Download

Abstract

This study presents the design analysis of a concrete mixer, aimed at enhancing construction efficiency and effectiveness. The materials employed for the mixer construction include a shaft, drum, chassis, blade, gear, pulley, belt, and motor. The working principle of the mixer involves the conversion of electrical energy from an electric motor into kinetic energy transmitted through a belt and pulley system to the driven shaft. This rotation subsequently drives the paddles welded to the shaft, facilitating the thorough mixing of concrete components such as cement, sand, gravel, and water within the drum. Further analysis covered the output power and system efficiency, revealing that the concrete mixer operates with an estimated efficiency of 99.77%. This high efficiency indicates that nearly all the input power is converted into useful work with minimal energy losses, underscoring the mixer's optimal design and performance. This research contributes significantly to the field of construction engineering by providing a well-designed, efficient, and reliable concrete mixer. The methodologies and calculations detailed in this study can serve as a reference for future projects aiming to improve construction machinery, ensuring that they meet high standards of efficiency and effectiveness.

Keywords:
Concrete Mixer Design Construction Fabrication Power transmission
APA Referencing Format

Wofuru-Nyenke, O. K. (2025). Design Analysis of a Portable Concrete Mixer. International Journal of Applied Sciences and Advanced Technology (IJASAT), 1(1), 1-6.

References

  1. Babor, D., Plian, D., & Judele, L. (2009). Environmental impact of concrete. Buletinul Institutului Politehnic din lasi. Sectia Constructii, Arhitectura, 55(4), 27.
  2. Crainic, L. N., & Munteanu, M. (2013). Seismic performance of concrete buildings. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group.
  3. Dastgerdi, A. S., Peterman, R. J., Riding, K., & Beck, B. T. (2019). Effect of concrete mixture components, proportioning, and compressive strength on fracture parameters. Construction and Building Materials, 206, 179-192.
  4. Ferraris, C. F. (2001). Concrete mixing methods and concrete mixers: state of the art. Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 106(2), 391.
  5. Khalaf, M. A., Ban, C. C., & Ramli, M. (2019). The constituents, properties and application of heavyweight concrete: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 215, 73-89.
  6. Khurmi, R., & Gupta, J. (2005). A textbook of machine design. S. Chand publishing.
  7. Kobaka, J. (2021). Principal component analysis as a statistical tool for concrete mix design. Materials, 14(10), 2668.
  8. Mehta, H., & Verma, K. (2022). Smart technologies in fabrication machines. Journal of Industrial Automation, 5(3), 77–84.
  9. Salama, W. (2017). Design of concrete buildings for disassembly: An explorative review. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 6(2), 617-635.
  10. Vorobieff, G. (2010). Challenges Confronting Sustainable Practices for Concrete Pavement Design and Construction in Australia. International Journal of Pavement Research & Technology, 3(5).
  11. Xiao, J., Ji, G., Zhang, Y., Ma, G., Mechtcherine, V., Pan, J., Wang, L., Ding, T., Duan, Z., & Du, S. (2021). Large-scale 3D printing concrete technology: Current status and future opportunities. Cement and Concrete Composites, 122, 104115.